Collaborative learning supported by rubrics improves critical thinking
Main Article Content
Abstract
In previous works we developed and assessed a teaching program, ARDESOS v.1, with which we aimed to improve the fundamental skills of Critical Thinking. The results obtained were positive, but modest. After analyzing the limitations of the program we introduced certain modifications and assessed the new version. The changes involved designing the activities programmed by means of rubrics and making the students perform them with less direct orientation from the instructor. In sum specificity and initiative proved to be the key variables in the improved program, ARDESOS v.2. The data collected pointed to a significant improvement of the new version over the old one in the following aspects: a) version 2 improved all the fundamental dimensions, mainly in the pre- and post-test measurements, to a significant extent (Student’s t test); b) the effect size (Cohen’s d) was significantly higher, and finally c) these improvements in the program elicited better performance. Accordingly, an improvement in Critical Thinking can be achieved via an instruction design that attends to the factors that really induce change. Currently, these results have allowed us to successfully add a new improvement to the instruction, which we havere-evaluated.
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
References
Almeida, L. (2013).Ajustamento e sucesso acadêmico no Ensino Superior: Um roteiro para a avaliação das suas dimensões psicológicas. IV Congresso Brasileiro de Avaliação Psicológica. Maceio 4-7 de Junio de 2013.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Olivares, S., Saiz, C. & Rivas, S.F. (2013). Encouragement for thinking critically. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 11(2), 367-394. doi: 10.14204/ejrep.30.12168
Rivas, S.F. & Saiz, C. (2012). Validación y propiedades psicométricas de la prueba de pensamiento crítico PENCRISAL [Validation and psychometric properties of the test of critical thinking PENCRISAL]. Revista Electrónica de Metodología Aplicada, 17(1), 18-34.
Saiz, C. (2013). Pensamiento crítico como reto personal y social. Palestra en el Programade Pos-graduaçao Stricto Senus en Psicología da Universidade Sao Franciso. 13 de Novembro, 2013. Itativa, Sao Paulo (Brasil).
Saiz, C. & Rivas, S.F. (2008). Evaluación del pensamiento crítico: una propuesta para diferenciar formas de pensar [Assessment of critical thinking: a proposal to distinguish ways of thinking]. Ergo, Nueva Época, 22-23 (marzo-septiembre), 25-66.
Saiz, C. & Rivas, S.F. (2011). Evaluation of the ARDESOS program: an initiative to improve critical thinking skills. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(2), 34-51.
Saiz, C. & Rivas, S.F. (2012). Pensamiento crítico y aprendizaje basado en problemas [Critical thinking and problem-based learning]. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 10 (3), 325-346.