The prisoner’s dilemma and economics 101: Do active learning exercises correlate with student performance?

Main Article Content

Chong Hyun Christie Byun

Abstract

The importance of active learning in the classroom has been well established in the field of Economic education. This paper examines the connection between active learning and performance outcomes in an Economics 101 course. Students participated in single play simultaneous move game with a clear dominant strategy, modeled after the Prisoner’s Dilemma. The hypothesis is that if a student understands the Prisoner’s Dilemma and the relevant assumptions in Economic theory, he will choose the dominant strategy in the game. But will his choice be correlated with his performance on two important metrics? Empirical evidence indicates that there is a correlation between a student’s performance on the Prisoner’s Dilemma game and his performance on the subsequent in-class exam and in the course overall.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Byun, C. H. C. (2014). The prisoner’s dilemma and economics 101: Do active learning exercises correlate with student performance?. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 14(5), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotlv14i5.12950
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Chong Hyun Christie Byun, Wabash College

Assistant Professor

Department of Economics

References

Becker, W. E. (1997). Teaching economics to undergraduates. Journal of Economic Literature, 35 (3),1347-1373.

Brouhle, K. (2011). Exploring strategic behavior in an oligopoly market using classroom clickers. The Journal of Economic Education, 42 (4), 395 – 404. doi: 10.1080/00220485.2011.606093

Buchs, A., & Blanchard, O. (2011). Exploring the concept of sustainable development through role-playing. The Journal of Economic Education, 42 (2), 388 – 394. doi: 10.1080/00220485.2011.606089

Cardell, N.S., Fort. R., Joerding, W., Inaba, F., Lamoreaux, D., Rosenman, R., Stromsdorfer, E., & Bartlett, R. (1996). Laboratory-based experimental and demonstration initiatives in teaching undergraduate economics. The American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings of the 108th Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, 86 (2), 454 – 459.

Coakley, L. A., & Sousa, K. J. (2013). The effect of contemporary learning approaches on student perceptions in an introductory business course. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13 (3), 1-22.

Cooper, R., DeJong, D. V., Forsythe, R., & Ross, T. W. (1996). Cooperation without reputation: Experimental evidence from Prisoner’s Dilemma games. Games and Economic Behavior, 12, 187-218. doi: 10.1006/game.1996.0013

Dixit, A., & Skeath, S. (1999). Games of Strategy. New York, London: W.W. Norton & Company.

Doebeli, M., & Hauert, C. (2005). Models of cooperation based on the Prisoner’s Dilemma and the Snowdrift game. Ecology Letters, 8, 748-766. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00773.x

Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003). The nature of human altruism. Nature, 23, 785-791. doi: 10.1038/nature02043

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111

Khadjavi, M., & Lange, A. (2013). Prisoners and their dilemma. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 92, 163-175. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2013.05.015

Kuhn, S. (2014). Prisoner’s Dilemma. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/prisoner-dilemma/

Lewis, L. Y. (2011). A virtual field trip to the real world of cap and trade: Environmental economics and the EPA SO2 allowance auction. The Journal of Economic Education, 42 (4), 354 – 365. doi: 10.1080/00220485.2011.606086

McCarthy, J. P., & Anderson, L. (2000). Active learning techniques versus traditional teaching styles: Two experiments from history and political science. Innovative Higher Education, 24 (4), 279 – 294. doi: 10.1023/B:IHIE.0000047415.48495.05

Mehta, S. (2006). How Apple could rock wireless. Fortune Magazine.

Mohan, G. (2013). Economists finally test Prisoner’s Dilemma on prisoners. Los Angeles Times.

Nguyen, T. T., & Trimarchi, A. (2010). Active learning in introductory economics: Do MyEconLab and Aplia make any difference? International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 4 (1).

Reay, D., David, M., & Ball, S. (2001). Making a difference? Institutional habituses and higher education choice. Sociological Research Online, 5 (4). doi: 10.5153/sro.548

Siegfried, J. T., & Fels, R. (1979). Research on teaching economics: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 17 (3), 923-969.

Simpkins, S., & Barbour, J. (1998). Surfing for success in economics: A student’s guide to the internet. Prentice-Hall.

Thomas, L. (2002). Student retention in higher education: The role of institutional habitus. Journal of Education Policy, 17 (4), 423-442. doi: 10.1080/02680930210140257

Valcarcel, V. J. (2013). Instituting a monetary economy in a semester-long macroeconomics course. The Journal of Economic Education, 44 (2), 129 – 141. doi: 10.1080/00220485.2013.770337

Watts, M., & Becker, W. E. (2008). A little more than chalk and talk: Results from a third national survey of teaching methods in undergraduate economics courses. Journal of Economic Education, 39 (3), 237 – 286. doi: 10.3200/JECE.39.3.273-286

Yoder, J. D., & Hochevar, C. M. (2005). Encouraging active learning can improve students’ performance on examinations. Teaching of Psychology, 32 (2), 91 – 95. doi: 10.1207/s15328023top3202_2