Evidences of Transformative Learning in Service-Learning Reflections
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract
A major shift in university course work involves activities outside the traditional classroom in which students are required to apply knowledge from the coursework in real-life service-learning environments. Such complex learning contexts generate a level of disequilibrium or anxiety that may or may not result in transformative learning.
This phenomenological study examined student reflective writings from an Honors service-learning course at a medium-sized mid-western university for evidences of transformative learning, the precipitating disequilibria, and the significant pedagogical structures underlying growth.
All students learned and all students encountered disquieting experiences; however, only half the participants exhibited varying levels of transformative learning. Results indicate that transformative learning requires time, space, and appropriate scaffolding to develop or augment personal internal systems of adjusting what one thinks and how one thinks about new information and experiences.
The results further suggest that a framework of iterative service experiences, grounded in course content, readings, faculty-student-community dialogue, and continuous, thoughtfully designed, reflective practice can maximize transformative learning potentials. Future research should continue to explore how service-learning is experienced by individual participants and what contextual factors are essential for increasing the likelihood that transformative learning will occur.Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
References
Alhadeff-Jones, M. (2012). Transformative learning and the challenges of complexity. In E. Taylor & P. Cranton (Eds.). The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 178-194). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Astin, A. & Astin, H. (1996). A social change model of leadership development: Guidebook, version III. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, University of California.
Astin, A., Vogelgesang, L., Ikeda, E., & Yee, J. (2000). How service learning affects students. Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.
Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York, NY: Harper Collins Publishers.
Clayton, P., Bringle, R., Senor, B., Huq, J., & Morrison, M. (2010). Differentiating and assessing relationships in service-learning and civic engagement: Exploitative, transactional, or transformational. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 17, 5-22.
Cranton, P. (2006). Understanding and promoting transformative learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cress, C., Collier, P., & Reitenauer, V. & Associates (2013). Learning through serving: A student guidebook for service-learning across the disciplines, 2nd Ed. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC.
Daloz, L. (1999). Mentor: Guiding the journey of adult learners. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Dirkx, J. (2001). The power of feeling: Emotion, imagination, and the construction of meaning in adult learning. In S. Merriam (Ed.). The new update on adult learning theory (pp. 63-72). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Dirkx, J. (2009). Facilitating transformative learning: Engaging emotions in an online context. In J. Mezirow & E. Taylor (Eds.). Transformative learning in practice: Insights from community, workplace, and higher education (pp. 57-66). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Enos, S., & Morton, K. (2003). Developing a theory and practice of campus community partnerships. In B. Jacoby & Associates (Eds.). Building partnerships for service-learning (pp. 20-41). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Eyler, J. & Giles, D. (1999). Where’s the learning in service-learning? San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Feinstein, B.C. (2004). Learning and transformation in the context of Hawaiian traditional ecological knowledge. Adult Education Quarterly, 54, 105-120.
Green A. E. (2003). Difficult stories: Service-learning, race, class and whiteness. College Composition and Communication, 55.
Green A. E. (2001). But you aren’t white: Racial perceptions and service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 18-26.
Hatcher, J., Bringle, R., & Muthiah, R. (2004). Designing effective reflection: What matters to service-learning? Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 4, 22-29.
Hill-Jackson, V., & Lewis, C. W. (2011). White pre-service teachers preparing for diversity in an underserved community. In T. Stewart and N. Webster (Eds.). Problematizing servicelearning: Critical reflections for development and action. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Kiely, R. (2005). A transformative learning model for service-learning: A longitudinal case study. Michigan Journal of Community Service-Learning,12(1), 5-22.
King, P. & Kitchener, K. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Kitchener, K. & King, P. (1990). The reflective judgment model: Transforming assumptions about knowing. In J. Mezirow (Ed.). Fostering critical reflection in adulthood (pp. 141-158). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Litke, R. (2002). Do all students “Get it?”: Comparing students reflections to course performance, Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 27-34.
Mabry, J. B. (1998). Pedagogical variations in service-learning and student outcomes: How time, contact, and reflection matter. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 5, 3247.
Markus, G., Howard, J., & King, D. (1993). Integrating community service and classroom instruction enhances learning: Results from an experiment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 410-419.
Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mezirow, J. (2000). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mezirow, J. (2009). Transformative learning theory. In J. Mezirow & E. Taylor (Eds.). Transformative learning in practice: Insights from community, workplace, and higher education (pp. 18-31). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Sinnott, J. (2003). Learning as a humanistic dialogue with reality: New theories that help us teach the whole person. In T. Hagstrom (Ed.). Adult development in post-industrial society and working life (pp. 78-152). Stockholm: Stockholm University.
Taylor, E. & Cranton, P. (2012). Transformative learning theory: Seeking a more unified theory. In E. Tayor & P. Cranton (Eds.). The handbook of transformative learning: theory, research, and practice (pp. 3-20). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Wolcott, S. & Lynch, C. (2001). Task prompts for different levels in steps to better thinking (online).http://www.WolcottLynch.com.