Professor Age and Gender Affect Student Perceptions and Grades
Main Article Content
Abstract
Student evaluations provide rich information about teaching performance, but a number of factors beyond teacher effectiveness influence student evaluations. In this study we examined the effects of professor gender and perceived age on ratings of effectiveness and rapport as well as academic performance. Participants (N = 308) saw a picture of either a young or old male or female professor while listening to an audio lecture. Students reported greater perceived rapport with the female relative to the male professors and for younger versus older professors. However, students reported the male professors as more competent than the female professors. An interaction revealed that among female professors only, younger women were rated higher on rapport than comparison conditions. Thus, age and gender bias likely impact student evaluations of teaching. Our study also revealed higher quiz grades in the older-female condition, perhaps best explained by the older woman activating a schema for “mom.” Taken together, our results indicate that professor competence and kindness may foster learning best in the context of high expectations.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
References
Abramson, A., & Silverstein, M. (2004). Images of aging in America 2004. Retrieved December 18, 2014, from http://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/general/images_aging.pdf
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. New York: Addison-Wesley.
Arbuckle, J., & Williams, B. D. (2003). Students’ perceptions of expressiveness: Age and gender effects on teacher evaluations. Sex Roles, 49(9/10), 507-516. doi: 10.1023/A:1025832707002
Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait concept and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 230-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.230
Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 19681987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265-289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.265
Danziger, P. R., & Welfel, E. R. (2000). Age, gender, and health bias in counselors: An empirical analysis. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 22, 135-149.
Dion, K. E., Berscheid & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3), 285-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.109
Ebert, I. D., Steffans, M. C., & Kroth, A. (2014). Warm, but maybe not to competent?– Contemporary implicit stereotypes of women and men in Germany. Sex Roles, 70(9-10), 359375. doi: 10.1007/s11199-014-0369-5
Felton, J., Koper, P. T., Mitchell, J., & Stinson, M. (2008). Attractiveness, easiness, and other issues: Student evaluations of professors on Ratemyprofessors.com. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(1), 45-61. doi: 10.1080/02602930601122803
Felton, J., Mitchell, J., & Stinson, M. (2004). Web-based student evaluations of professors: The relations between perceived quality, easiness, and sexiness. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(1), 91-108. doi: 10.1080/0260293032000158180
Freng, S., & Webber, D. (2009). Turning up the heat on online teaching evaluations: Does “hotness” matter? Teaching of Psychology, 36, 189-193. doi: 10.1080/00986280902959739
Goebel, B. L., & Cashen, V. M. (1979). Age, sex, and attractiveness as factors in student ratings of teachers: A developmental study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(5), 646-653. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.71.5.646
Gurung, R. A. R., & Vespia, K. (2007). Looking good, teaching well? Linking liking, looks, and learning. Teaching of Psychology, 34(1), 5-10. doi: 10.1080/00986280709336641
Hamermesh, D. S., & Parker, A. (2005). Beauty in the classroom: Instructors’ pulchritude and putative pedagogical productivity. Economics of Education Review, 24, 369-376. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.07.013
Horner, K. L., Murray, H. G., & Rushton, J. P. (1989). Relation between aging and rated teaching effectiveness of academic psychologists. Psychology and Aging, 4(2), 226-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.4.2.226
Kierstead, D., D’Agostino, P., & Dill, H. (1988). Sex role stereotyping of college professors: Bias in students’ ratings of instructors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 342-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.342
Kock, A. J., D’Mello, S. D., & Sackett, P. R. (2015). A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(1), 128-161. http://dx.doiorg/10.1037/a0036734
Legg, A. M., & Wilson, J. H. (2009). Email from professor enhances student motivation and attitudes. Teaching of Psychology, 36, 205-211. doi: 10.1080/00986280902960034
Löckenhoff, C. E., Chan, W., McCrae, R. R., De Fruyt, F., Jussim, L., De Bolle, M., et al. (2014). Gender stereotypes of personality: Universal and accurate? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(5), 675-694. doi: 10.1177/0022022113520075
Lucăcel, R., & Băban, A. (2014). Young peoples’ perspective regarding aging. Cognition, Brain, Behavior. An International Journal, 18(2), 151-161.
Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L. A. (1997). Making student evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: The critical issues of validity, bias, and utility. American Psychologist, 52(11), 11871197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.11.1187
Remedios, R., & Lieberman, D. A. (2008). I liked your course because you taught me well: The influence of grades, workload, expectations, and goals on students’ evaluations of teaching. British Educational Research Journal, 34(1), 91-115. doi: 10.1080/01411920701492043
Riniolo, T. C., Johnson, K. C., Sherman, T. R., & Misso, J. A. (2006). Hot or not: Do professors perceived as physically attractive receive higher student evaluations? The Journal of General Psychology, 133(1), 19-35. doi: 10.3200/GENP.133.1.19-35
Ryan, R., & Wilson, J. H. (2014). Professor-Student Rapport Scale: Psychometric properties of the brief version. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 14(3), 64-74.
Sarwer, D. B., Grossbart, T. A., & Didie, E. R. (2003). Beauty and society. Seminars in Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery, 22(2), 79-92.
Sprague, J., & Massoni, K. (2005). Student evaluations and gendered expectations: What we can’t count can hurt us. Sex Roles, 53(11/12), 779-793. doi: 10.1007/s11199-005-8292-4
Wilson, J. H., Beyer, D., & Monteiro, H. (2014). Professor age affects student ratings: Halo effect for younger teachers. College Teaching, 62, 20-24. doi: 10.1080/87567555.2013.825574
Wilson, J. H., Stadler, J. R., Schwartz, B. M., & Goff, D. M. (2009). Touching your students: The impact of a handshake on the first day of class. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(1), 108-117.
Wilson, J. H., & Ryan, R. G. (2013). Student-teacher rapport scale: Six items predict student outcomes. Teaching of Psychology, 40, 130-133.
Wilson, J. H., & Wilson, S. B. (2007). The first day of class affects student motivation: An experimental study. Teaching of Psychology, 34, 226-230. doi: 10.1080/00986280701700151
Zajonc, R. B. (1968) Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monographs, 9(2, Pt. 2). http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0025848
Zebrowitz, L. A., Olson, K., & Hoffman, K. (1993). Stability of babyfaceness and attractiveness across the life span. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(3), 453-466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.3.453