Investigating the Impact of Feedback Instruction: Partnering Preservice Teachers with Middle School Students to Provide Digital, Scaffolded Feedback
Main Article Content
Abstract
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
References
American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (2014). About edTPA. Retrieved from http://edtpa.aacte.org/about-edtpa.
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design implication for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13, 544-559. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR13-4/baxter.pdf.
Beaumont, C., Doherty, M., & Shannon, L. (2011). Conceptualizing assessment feedback: A key to improving student learning? Studies in Higher Education, 36, 671-687.
Brookhart, S. M. (2008). How to give effective feedback to your students. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Cook, T., & Campbell, D. (1979). Quasi-experimental design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing Company.
Creswell, J. (2005). Educational research: Planning conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Cruickshank, D. R., Metcalf, K. K., & Bainer Jenkins, D. (2009). The act of teaching (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Falter Thomas, A., & Lenox, J. (2015). Two codes are greater than one: Developing students’ vocabularies with images and visualization. Illinois Reading Council Journal, 43 (1), 15-28.
Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2013). Common Core English Language Arts in a PLC at Work, Grades 6-8. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
Fullan, M. (2006). Change theory: A force for school improvement. Center for Strategic Education. Retrieved from http://www.michaelfullan.ca/media/13396072630.pdf.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81-112.
Hatziapostolou, T., & Paraskakis, I. (2010). Enhancing the impact of formative feedback on student learning through an online feedback system. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 8, 111-122.
Hawe, E., Dixon, H., & Watson, E. (2008). Oral feedback in the context of written language. Australian Journal of Language & Literacy, 31, 43-58.
Hyland, P. (2000). Learning from feedback in assessment. In P. Hyland & A. Booth (Eds.), The practice of university history teaching (pp. 233-247). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Mertler, C. A., & Campbell, C. (2005). Measuring teachers’ knowledge and application of classroom assessment concepts: Development of the assessment literacy inventory. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) in Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. (n.d.). Scaffolding. Retrieved from http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/students/learning/lr1scaf.htm.
Parr, J., & Timperley, H. (2010). Feedback to writing, assessment for teaching and learning and student progress. Assessing Writing, 15, 68-85.
Pecheone, R., & Chung, R. (2006) Evidence in teacher education: The performance assessment for California teachers, Journal of Teacher Education. 57, 22–36.
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144.
Sato, M. (2014). What Is the Underlying Conception of Teaching of the edTPA? Journal of Teacher Education, 65 (5) 421–434.
Sondergeld, T. A. (2014). Closing the gap between STEM teacher classroom assessment expectations and skills. School Science and Mathematics, 114 (4), 151-153.
Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning and Equity. (2014). A performance-based approach to license teacher candidates and support program improvement, Retrieved from https://scale.stanford.edu/teaching/edtpa.
Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning and Equality-SCALE. (2013). edTPA field test: Summary report. Stanford University.
Twenge, J. M. (2013). Teaching generation me. Teaching of Psychology, 40 (1), 66-69.
Yin, R. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publishing.
Zhu, C. (2012). Providing formative feedback to students via emails and feedback strategies based on student metacognition. Reflecting Education, 8, 78-93.