Uptake of Optional Activities Leads to Improved Performance in a Biomedical Sciences Class

Main Article Content

Heather Verkade
Saw Hoon Lim

Abstract

Students value optional (non-assessed) learning activities as they can use them to achieve their intended grade. Such additional activities can also be useful to cater for different levels of background knowledge and therefore to equalise the students’ opportunity to succeed. This study examines the implementation of two optional activities, one online and one paper-based. The activities complemented the lectures and practical (laboratory) classes and were designed to give students additional practice with the key concepts. It was predominantly the most ambitious students who engaged with the activities. Those students who engaged with the activities achieved a higher mark relative to their mark in a comparable prerequisite class. The students strongly preferred the paper activities, and although they would like both online and paper options to be available, they would not be willing to pay a small fee for the online activity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Verkade, H., & Lim, S. H. (2015). Uptake of Optional Activities Leads to Improved Performance in a Biomedical Sciences Class. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(6), 48–62. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v15i6.18988
Section
Articles

References

Buchanan, T. (2000). The efficacy of a World-Wide Web mediated formative assessment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16(3), 193-200.DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2729.2000.00132.x

Collis, B., De Boer, W., & Slotman, K. (2001). Feedback for web-based assignments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(3), 306-313.DOI 10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00185.x

Cook, A. (2001). Assessing the Use of Flexible Assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(6), 539-549.10.1080/02602930120093878

De Vita, G. (2001). Learning styles, culture and inclusive instruction in the multicultural classroom: A business and management perspective. Innovations in Education and Training International, 38(2), 165-174.Doi 10.1080/14703290110035437

Entwistle, N., & McCune, V. (2004). The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 325-345.DOI 10.1007/s1064800400030

Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students' learning. Learning and teaching in higher education(1), 3-31

Hoskins, S. L, & van Hooff, J. C. (2005). Motivation and ability: which students use online learning and what influence does it have on their achievement? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 36(2), 177-192

Inglis, M., Palipana, A., Trenholm, S., & Ward, J. (2011). Individual differences in students' use of optional learning resources. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(6), 490-502.10.1111/j.13652729.2011.00417.x

McKenzie, Kirsten, & Schweitzer, Robert. (2001). Who Succeeds at University? Factors predicting academic performance in first year Australian university students. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(1), 21-33.10.1080/07924360120043621

Peat, M., & Franklin, S. (2002). Supporting student learning: the use of computer-based formative assessment modules. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 515-523.Doi 10.1111/14678535.00288

Peat, M., & Franklin, S. (2003). Has student learning been improved by the use of online and offline formative assessment opportunities? Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 87-99

Rayner, G. (2008). Using 'MasteringBiology' to formatively improve student engagement and learning in first year Biology. Paper presented at the Proceedings, ATN Assessment Conference 2008: Engaging students in assessment, University of South Australia, Adelaide SA, Australia.

Shaya, S. B., Petty, H. R., & Petty, L. I. (1993). A Case-Study of Supplemental Instruction in Biology Focused on at-Risk Students. Bioscience, 43(10), 709-711.Doi 10.2307/1312343

Sherman, Richard C. (1998). Using the World Wide Wed to teach everyday applications of social psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 25(3), 212-216.10.1207/s15328023top2503_15

Sly, Leith. (1999). Practice Tests as Formative Assessment Improve Student Performance on Computer‐managed Learning Assessments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(3), 339-343.10.1080/0260293990240307

van Dinther, Mart, Dochy, Filip, & Segers, Mien. (2011). Factors affecting students' self-efficacy in higher education. Educational Research Review, 6, 95-108

Yeoh, H.B., & Md Yunus, A.S. (2013). A holistic Approach to Activate and Enhance Prior Knowledge of Tertiary Learners in the Upcoming Lectures of Calculus. World Applied Sciences Journal 21(Special Issue of Applied Math), 156-161.10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.21.am.21139