Student Off-Task Electronic Multitasking Predictors: Scale Development and Validation

Article Sidebar

cover image
PDF
Published: May 11, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v17i2.20682
Keywords:
off-task electronic multitasking, scale development

Main Article Content

Yuxia Qian
Kutztown University
Li Li
University of Wyoming at Casper

Abstract

In an attempt to better understand factors contributing to students’ off-task electronic multitasking behavior in class, the research included two studies that developed a scale of students’ off-task electronic multitasking predictors (the SOTEMP scale), and explored relationships between the scale and various classroom communication processes and outcomes. The first study inductively developed initial typologies for the SOTEMP scale, refined the scale item pool, and explored the dimensions of the scale. Subsequently, the second study validated the scale through a confirmatory factor analysis and by assessing different concurrently existing communication processes as well as students’ perceived learning outcomes. Four factors were found: Lack of Class Relating, Technology Dependence, Class Easiness, and Overwhelmed feeling. Reliability and validity were established for the scale. Results indicated the SOTEMP scale was positively related to students’ cognitive absorption, and negatively related to students’ perception of their affective learning. However, the SOTEMP scale was not related to students’ perceived cognitive learning. Limitations and implications for future research are discussed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Qian, Y., & Li, L. (2017). Student Off-Task Electronic Multitasking Predictors: Scale Development and Validation. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 17(2), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v17i2.20682
Issue
Vol. 17 No. 2 (2017): Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Section
Articles
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
     
  2. Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.

  3. In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
Author Biographies

Yuxia Qian, Kutztown University

Assistant Professor

Department of Communication Studies

Li Li, University of Wyoming at Casper

Assistant Professor

Communication and Journalism Department

References

Abrams, J., & Giles, H. (2007). Hispanic American television activity: Is it related to vitality perceptions?. Conference Papers -- International Communication Association. Retrieved May 31, 2009, from Communication & Mass Media Complete database.

Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24, 665–694.

Bandura, A. (1986). Chapter 9 Self-efficacy. In Social functions of thought and action (pp. 390-453). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Best, J. B. (1986). Chapter 2 Attention and pattern recognition. In Cognitive psychology (pp. 34-71). St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.

Bloom, B., Englehart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives – the classification of educational goals, handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York: McKay.

Bourne, L., Dominowski, R., & Loftus, E. (1979). Cognitive processes. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Byun, S., Ruffini, C., Mills, J. E., Douglas, A. C., Niang, M., Stepchenkova, S., … Blanton, M. (2009). Internet addiction: Metasynthesis of 1996–2006 quantitative research. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 12, 203–207.

Chang, T. (2012). Predictors of students’ multitasking behavior. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference 2012 (pp. 3558-3563). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.

Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10, 1-9.

Ekanayake, S. Y. & Wishart, J. (2015). Integrating mobile phones into teaching and learning: A case study of teacher training through professional development workshops. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46 (1), 173-189.

Ellis, K. (2004). The impact of perceived teacher confirmation on receiver apprehension, motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 53, 1-20.

Ferguson, R. F., Philips, S. F., Rowley, J. F.S., & Friedlander, J. W. (2015). The influence of teaching beyond standardized test scores: Engagement, mindsets, and agency. Retrieved May 23, 2016, from http://www.agi.harvard.edu/projects/TeachingandAgency.pdf

Fried, C. B. (2008). In-class laptop use and its effects on student learning. Computers & Education, 50, 906-914.

Frymier, A.B., & Houser, M.L. (1999). The revised learning indicators scale. Communication Studies, 50, 1-12.

Fulk, J., Schmitz, J., & Steinfield, C. W. (1990). A social influence model of technology use. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 117-140). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Garrett, R. K., & Danziger, J. N. (2008). IM= Interruption management? Instant messaging and disruption in the workplace. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 13(1), 23-42.

Gerow, J. E., Galluch, P. S. & Thatcher, J. B. (2010). To slack or not to slack: Internet usage in the classroom. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 11, 524.

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.

Goodboy, A. K. (2011). The development and validation of the instructional dissent scale. Communication Education, 60, 422-440.

Grinols, A. B., & Rajesh, R. (2014). Multitasking with smartphones in the college classroom. Business & Professional Communication Quarterly, 77, 89-95.

Hassoun, D. (2015). “All over the place”: A case study of classroom multitasking and attentional performance. New Media & Society, 17(10), 1680-1695.

Hembrooke, H., & Gay, G. (2003). The laptop and the lecture: the effects of multitasking in learning environments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15(1), 46–64.

Hsu, C. (2012). The influence of vocal qualities and confirmation of nonnative Englishspeaking teachers on student receiver apprehension, affective learning, and cognitive learning. Communication Education, 61, 4-16.

Jamal, A., & Melkote, S. (2008). Viewing and avoidance of the Al-Jazeera satellite television channel in Kuwait: a uses and gratifications perspective. Asian Journal of Communication, 18, 1-15.

Jeong, S., & Fishbein, M. (2007). Predictors of multitasking with media: Media factors and audience factors. Media Psychology, 10, 364-384.

Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (1985). Power in the classroom III: Teacher communication techniques and messages. Communication Education, 34, 19-28.

Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.

Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook II. New York: David McKay.

Lang, A. (2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 50, 46–70.

Lee, J., Lin, L., & Robertson, T. (2012). The impact of media multitasking on learning. Learning, Media & Technology, 37(1), 94-104.

Lewin, K. (1939). Field theory and experiment in social psychology: Concepts and methods. The American Journal of Sociology, 44, 868–896.

Lysne, S. J. & Miller, B.G. (2015). Using mobile devices to engage students in evolutionary thinking. The American Biology Teacher, 77 (8), 624-627.

MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130-149.

Mahatanankoon, P., & O’Sullivan, P. (2008). Attitude toward mobile text messaging: An expectancy-based perspective. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 973992.

Mayer, R. E. (1998). Cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational aspects of problem solving. Instructional Science, 26, 49-63.

Mayer, R. E. (2008). Old advice for new researchers. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 19-28.

McCroskey, J.C. (1994). Assessment of affect toward communication and affect toward instruction in communication. In S. Morreale & M. Brooks (Eds.), 1994 SCA summer conference proceedings and prepare remarks (pp. 55-68). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.

McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P., Plax, T. G., & Kearney, P. (1985). Power in the classroom: Behavior alteration techniques, communication training and learning. Communication Education, 34, 214-226.

McCroskey, J. C., & Young, T. J. (1979). The use and abuse of factor analysis in communication research. Human Communication Research, 5, 375-382.

Moeller, S., Chong, E., Golitsinski, S., Guo, J., McCaffrey, R., Nynka, A., & Roberts, J. (2010). A day without media. International Center for Media and the Public Agenda. Retrieved May 23, 2010, from http://withoutmedia.wordpress.com/

Olmsted, N.M., & Terry, C. P. (2014). Who's texting in class? A look at behavioral and psychological predictors. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 19 (4), 183-190.

Park, H., Dailey, R., & Lemus, D. (2002). The use of Exploratory Factor Analysis and Principal Components Analysis in communication research. Human Communication Research, 28, 562-577.

Patil, V. H., Singh, S. N., Mishra, S., & Donavan, D. D. (2008). Efficient theory development and factor retention criteria: Abandon the “eigenvalue greater than one” criterion. Journal of Business Research, 61, 162-170.

Plax, T. G., Kearney, P., McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1986). Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy and affective learning. Communication Education, 35, 43-55.

Rubenstein, J. S., Meyer, D. E., & Evans, J. E. (2001), Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 763-797.

Rubin, A. M. (1994). Media uses and effects: A uses-and-gratifications perspective. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 417436). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Sana, F., Weston, T. & Cepeda, N.J. (2013). Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers. Computers and Education, 62, 24-31.

Shechtman, Z., & Leichtentritt, J. (2004). Affective teaching: a method to enhance classroom management. European Journal of Teacher Education, 27, 323-333.

Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchland, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 765–781.

Skinner, E. & Belmont, M. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571-581.

Stephen, K. K. & Davis, J. (2009). The social influences on electronic multitasking in organizational meetings. Management Communication Quarterly, 23, 63-83.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Wei, F.F. & Wang, Y.K. (2010). Students’ silent messages: Can teacher verbal and nonverbal immediacy moderate student use of text messaging in class? Communication Education, 59, 475-496.

Young, J. R. (2006). The fight for classroom attention: Professor vs. laptop. Chronicle of Higher Education, 52(39), A27-A29.

Zhu, J., & He, Z. (2002). Perceived characteristics, perceived needs, and perceived popularity: Adoption and use of the Internet in China. Communication Research, 29(4), 466-495.