Student's perceptions of plagiarism

Main Article Content

Reva M. Fish
Gerri M. Hura

Abstract

While plagiarism by college students is a serious problem that must be addressed, students generally overestimate the frequency of plagiarism at their schools and blame students they do not know for the majority of incidents. This study looked at students’ estimations of the frequency of plagiarism at a large urban college and explored how that varied over the full range of types of plagiarism, from using another author’s ideas to submitting an entire document copied verbatim from another author’s work. Analysis of student responses to survey items revealed they believe other students are far more likely than them to commit each type of plagiarism and they recognize that some types of plagiarism are more serious than others. The opportunity to reduce incidents of plagiarism by providing students with accurate information about plagiarism at their schools is discussed in the context of social norms theory.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Fish, R. M., & Hura, G. M. (2013). Student’s perceptions of plagiarism. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13(5), 33–45. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/3654
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Reva M. Fish, SUNY Buffalo State

Social and Psychological Foundations of Education Department

Assistant Professor

Gerri M. Hura, SUNY Buffalo State

Adult Education Department

Associate Professor

References

Angell, L. R. (2006). The relationship of impulsiveness, personal efficacy, and academic motivation to college cheating. College Student Journal, 40(1), 118-131.

Barnas, M. (2000). “Parenting” students: Applying developmental psychology to the college classroom. Teaching of Psychology, 27, 276-277.

Belter, R. W., & DuPre A. (2009). A strategy to reduce plagiarism in an undergraduate course. Teaching of Psychology, 36(4), 257-261

Berkowitz, A. D. (2004). An overview of the social norms approach. In L. Lederman, L. Stewart, F. Goodhart and L. Laitman (Eds). Changing the Culture of College Drinking: A Socially Situated Prevention Campaign (187-208). New York, NY: Hampton Press.

Blum, S. D. (2009). My word! Plagiarism and college culture. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.

Brown, G. (2012). Student disruption in a global college classroom: Multicultural issues as predisposing factors. Association of Black Nursing Faculty Journal, 23(3), 63-69.

Chen, H., Cohen, P., & Chen S. (2010). How big is a big odds ratio? Interpreting the magnitudes of odds rations in epidemiological studies. Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation, 39(4), 860-864.

Colnerud, G., & Rosander, M. (2009). Academic dishonesty, ethical norms, and learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(5), 505-517.

Conway, M., & Groshek, J. (2009). Forgive me now, fire me later: Mass communication students’ ethics gap concerning school and journalism. Communication Education, 58(4), 461482.

Engler, J. N., Landau, J. D., & Epstein, M. (2008). Keeping up with the Joneses: Students’ perceptions of academically dishonest behavior. Teaching of Psychology, 35, 99-102.

Feldman, L. J. (2001). Classroom civility is another of our instructor responsibilities. College Teaching, 49, 137-140.

Hard, S. F., Conway, J. M., & Moran, A. C. (2006). Faculty and colleges student beliefs about the frequency of student academic misconduct. The Journal of Postsecondary Education, 77(6), 1058-1080.

Hart, L., & Morgan, L. (2010). Academic integrity in an online registered nurse to baccalaureate in nursing program. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 41(11), 498-505.

Hudd, S. S., Apgar, C., Bronson, E. F., & Lee, R. G. (2009). Creating a campus culture of integrity: Comparing the perspectives of full- and part-time faculty. The Journal of Higher Education, 80(2), 146-177

Jones, D. L. R. (2011). Academic dishonesty: Are more students cheating? Business Communication Quarterly, 74(2), 141-150

Kuther, T.L. (2003). A profile of the ethical professor: Student views. College Teaching, 51(4), 153-160.

Kwong, T., Ng, H.M., Mark, K.P., & Wong, E. (2010). Students' and faculty's perception of academic integrity in Hong Kong, Campus-Wide Information Systems, 27(5), 341-355.

McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 219-233.

McHugh, M. L. (2009). The odds ratio: calculation, usage, and interpretation. Biochemia Medica, 19(2), 120-126.

Park, C. (2003). In other (people’s) words: Plagiarism by university students – literature and lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 471-488.

Perkins, H. W. (Ed.). (2003). The social norms approach to preventing school and college age substance abuse: A handbook for educators, counselors, and clinicians. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Perkins, H.W., & Berkowitz, A.D. (1986). Perceiving the community norms of alcohol use among students: Some research implications for campus alcohol education programming. International Journal of the Addictions, 21(9/10), 961-976.

Powers. L. G. (2009). University students’ perceptions of plagiarism. The Journal of Higher Education, 80(6), 643-662.

Rettinger, D. A., & Kramer, Y. (2009). Situational and personal causes of student cheating. Research in Higher Education, 50, 293–313.

Salmons, J. (2007). Online social culture: Does it foster original work or encourage plagiarism? Retrieved March 14, 2009 from http://www.vision2lead.com/Originality.pdf

Trost, K. (2009). Psst, have you ever cheated? A study of academic dishonesty in Sweden. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(4), 367-376

Trushell J., Byrne, K., & Simpson, R. (2012). Cheating behaviours, the internet and education undergraduate students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(2), 136-145.

Wang, Y. (2008). University student online plagiarism. International Journal on E-Learning, 7(4), 743-757.

Williams, K. M, Nathanson, C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2010). Identifying and profiling scholastic cheaters: Their personality, cognitive ability, and motivation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16, 293-307.