The effect of instructing critical thinking through debate on the EFL learners’ reading comprehension
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of instruction through debate on the male and female EFL learners’ reading comprehension, and to examine the difference between male and female EFL learners’ perception towards instructing critical thinking (CT) through debate. 88 learners, out of 120, were selected through convenience sampling method. Using a quantitative research method with experimental pre-and post-tests design, this study consisted of 44 participants in the experimental group and 44 participants in the control group. The experimental group received some treatment in the form of “the Meeting-House Debate” strategy, while the control group received no such treatment. After one month and a half treatment of experimental group, both groups participated in the post-test. Data analysis was done using descriptive and inferential statistics procedures. Findings showed that the debate strategy had statistically significant effect on the students’ reading comprehension. Also, results revealed that there was no significant difference between male and female EFL learners’ perception towards instructing CT through debate. It was concluded that instructing CT skills through debate strategy resulted in better understanding of reading texts.
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
References
Aloqaili, A.S. (2011). The relationship between reading comprehension and critical thinking: A theoretical study, Journal of King Saud University-Languages and Translation, 24, 35-41.
Bagherkazemi, M., & Birjandi, P. (2010). The relationship between Iranian EFL teachers’ critical thinking ability and their professional success. English Language Teaching, 3(2), 135145.
Bagherkazemi, M., Derakhshan, A., & Rezaei, S. (2011). Critical thinking in language education. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(4), 769-777.
Barjesteh , H., & Vaseghi, R. (2012). Critical thinking: A reading strategy in developing English reading comprehension performance. Sheikhbahaee EFL Journal, 1(2), 21-33.
California Academic Press. (2006). Insight assessment-tools to evaluate reasoning and critical thinking: California critical thinking skills test (CCTST). Millbrae, CA: author.
Chial, M., & Riall, A. (1994). Rules of engagement for classroom, debates. Retrieved May 9, 2012, from www.comdis.wisc.edu/staff/mrchial/PMT/pdfs/PMTDebates.pdf
Claytor, K.L. (1997). The development and validation of an adult medical nursing critical thinking instrument (andragogy). Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Second Edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Cosgrove, R. (2009). Critical thinking in the Oxford Tutorial. Retrieved May 5, 2012, from http://www.criticalthinking.org/.../d99ff67fa6f1fbcf22084daaaa9efa8951dc7f.com
Facione, P.A., & Facione, N.C. (2010). The California critical thinking skills test manual. Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press.
Facione, P.A., & Facione, N.C. (1994). The California critical thinking skills test and national league for nursing accreditation requirement. Millbrae, CA: California Academic.
Facione, P.A., Facione, N.C., & Giancarlo, C.A. (2000). The disposition toward critical thinking: Its character, measurement, and relationship to critical thinking skill. Informal Logic, 20(1), 6184.
Fahim, M., Bagherkazemi, M., & Alemi, M. (2010). The relationship between test takers’ critical thinking ability and their performance on the reading section of TOEFL. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(6), 830-837.
Fahim, M., & Saeepour, M. (2011). The impact of teaching critical thinking skills on reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(4), 867874.
Freeley, A., & Steinberg, D. (2005). Argumentation and debate: Critical thinking for reasoned decision making (11th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Glantz, S., & Gorman, B. (1997). He said, she said: Debating with technology. Technology Connection, 4(7), 14-16.
Goodwin, J. (2003). Students’ perspectives on debate exercises in content area classes. Communication Education, 52(2), 157-163.
Hashemi, S.A. (2011). The use of critical thinking in social science textbooks of high school: A field study of Fars province in Iran. International Journal of Instruction, 4(1), 64-78.
Khalili, H., & Soleimani, M. (2003). Determining the trust, credibility and norm scores of the California critical thinking skills test-Form B (TSTCC-B). Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences, 2, 84-90.
King, P.M., Mines, R.A., & Wood, P.K. (1990). Critical thinking among college and graduate students. The Review of Higher Education, 13(2), 167-186.
Lachini, K. (2003). Critical thinking and reading comprehension. Paper presented in the fourth linguistic conference, Allameh Tabatabaie University, Iran.
Omelicheva, M.Y., & Avdeyeva, O. (2008). Teaching with lecture or debate? Testing the effectiveness of traditional versus active learning methods of instruction. PS, 41(3), 603-7.
Osborne, A. (2005). Debate and student development in the history classroom. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 103, 39-50.
Rashtchi, M., & Sadraeimanesh, F. (2011). Is debate a useful strategy in enhancing the reading comprehension and critical thinking of Iranian EFL learners? Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(4), 361-369.
Richards, J.C. (2007). New Interchange. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Roy, A., & Macchiette, B. (2005). Debating the issue: A tool for augmenting critical thinking skills of marketing students. Journal of Marketing Education, 27(3), 264-276.
Sheikhy Behdani, R. (2009). The relationship between autonomy, critical thinking ability, and reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. Master’s thesis, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Campus, Tehran, Iran.
Snider, A., & Schnurer, M. (2002). Many sides: debate across the curriculum. New York: International debate education association.
Stancato, F.A. (2000). Tenure, academic freedom, and teaching of critical thinking. College Student Journal, 34(3), 377-382.
Stapleton, P. (2001). Assessing critical thinking in the writing of Japanese University students: Insights about assumptions and content familiarity. Written Communication, 18(4), 506-548.
Walsh, C. M. (1996). Critical thinking disposition of university students in practice disciplines (nursing, education, and business) and non-practice disciplines (English, history, and psychology): An exploratory study. College Park, MD, University of Maryland.
Waters, A. (2000). Thinking and language learning. English Language Teaching Journal, 60(4), 237-319.