Shaping Student Activists: Discursive Sensemaking of Activism and Participation Research
Main Article Content
Abstract
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
References
Arnold, L. B. (2000). “What is a feminist?:” Students’ descriptions. Women and Language, 23 (2), 8 – 18.
Aronson, P. (2003). “Feminists or postfeminists?”: Young women’s attitudes toward feminism and gender relations. Gender & Society, 17 (6), 903 – 922. doi: http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.net.ucf.edu/10.1177/0891243203257145
Atkinson, J. D. & Cooley, L. (2010). Narrative capacity, resistance performance, and the “shape” of the new social movement networks. Communication Studies, 61(3), 321-338. doi: 10.1080/10510971003752668
Baker, C. (2004). Membership Categorization and Interview Accounts. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, (pp. 162-76). London: Sage.
Bashir, N. Y., Lockwood, P., Chasteen, A. L., Nadolny, D., & Noyes, I. (2013). The ironic impact of activists: Negative stereotypes reduce social change influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 614-626. doi: http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.net.ucf.edu/10.1002/ejsp.1983
Barnett, K., Ropers-Huilman, R., & Aaron, L. (2008). A planning-process perspective on student activists’ upward influence attempts to effect campus change. Southern Communication Journal, 73(4), 332-346. doi: 10.1080/10417940802418833
Bishop, C. F., Caston, M. I., & King, C. A. (2014). Learner-centered environments: Creating effective strategies based on student attitudes and faculty reflection. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 14(3), 46-63. doi:10.14434/josotl.v14i3.5065.
Bond, R. M., Fariss, C. J., Jones, J. J., Kramer, A. D. I., Marlow, C., Settle, J. E., & Fowler, J. H. (2012). A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature, 489, 295-298.
Butler, C. W. (2008). Talk and social interaction in the playground. Ashgate Publishing Company: Burlington, VT.
Chambers, T. & Phelps, C. E. (1993). Student activism as a form of leadership and student development. National Association of Student Personnel Administrators, 31, 19–29.
Cermak, M. J., Christiansen, J. A., Finnegan, A. C., Gleeson, A. P., White, S. K., & Leach, D. K. (2011). Displacing Activism? The impact of international service trips on understanding of social change. Education, Citizenship, & Social Justice, 6(1), 5-19.
Cox, K., & McAdams, D. P. (2012). The transforming self: Service narratives and emerging change in emerging adulthood. Journal of Adolescent Research, 27(1), 18-43. doi: 10.1177/0743558410384732
Galizzi, M. (2014). Bringing Adam Smith’s pin factory to life: Field trips and discussions as forms of experiential learning. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 14(5), 2747. doi:10.14434/josotlv14i512938.
Gladwell, M. (2010, Oct. 4). Small change: Why the revolution will not be tweeted. The New Yorker. Retrieved July 30, 2012, from http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/10/04/101004fa_fact_gladwell
Gilbert, E., & Karahalios, K. (2009). Predicting tie strength with social media. In CHI ’09: Proceedings of the 27th annual SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 211-220). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Hardaker, C. (2010). Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions. Journal of Politeness Research, 6, 214-242. doi: 10.1515/JPLR.2010.011
Harlow & Harp (2012). Collective action on the web. Information, Communication & Society, 15(2), 196-216. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2011.591411
Hartnett, S. J., Wood, J. K., & McCann, B. J. (2011). Turning silence into speech and action: Prison activism and the pedagogy of empowered citizenship. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 8(4), 331-352. doi: 10.1080/14791420.2011.615334
Hooghe, M., Vissers, S., Stolle, D., & Maheo, V. (2010). The potential of Internet mobilization: An experimental study on the effect of Internet and face-to-face mobilization efforts. Political Communication, 27, 406-431. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2010.516799
Jost, J. T., Chaikalis-Petritsis, V., Abrams, D., Sidanius, J., van der Toorn, J., & Bratt, C., (2012). Why men (and women) do and don't rebel: Effects of system justification on willingness to protest. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 197-208. doi: 10.1177/0146167211422544
Leaper, C. & Arias, D. M. (2011). College women’s feminist identity: A multidimensional analysis with implications for coping with sexism. Sex Roles, 6(7-8), 475-490. doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-9936-1
Levy, D. L., & Byrd, D. C. (2011). Why can’t we be friends? Using music to teach social justice. Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(2), 64-75.
Lotan, G., Graeff, E., Ananny, M., Gaffney, D., Pearce, I., & Boyd, D. (2011). The revolutions were tweeted: Information flows during the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian Revolutions. International Journal of Communication, 5, 1375-1405.
Marichal, J. (2013). Political Facebook groups: Micro-activism and the digital front stage. First Monday, 18(12). doi:10.5210/fm.v18i12.4653
McHoul, A. (2007). ‘Killers’ and ‘friendlies’: Names can hurt me. Social Identities, 13(4), 459469. doi: 10.1080/13504630701459131
Mirani, L. (2010, Oct. 2). Sorry Malcolm Gladwell, the revolution may well be tweeted. The Guardian. Retrieved July 30, 2010, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2010/oct/02/malcolm-gladwell-socialnetworking-kashmir
Mueller, A., Juris, S. J., Willermet, C., Drake, E., Upadhaya, S., & Chhetri, P. (2014). Assessing interdisciplinary learning and student activism in a Water issues course. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 14(2), 111-132. doi:10.14434/josotl.v14i2.4052.
Nam, C. (2012). Implications of community activism among urban minority young people for education for engaged and critical citizenship. International Journal of Progressive Education, 8(3), 62-76.
Olson, L. N., Coffelt, T. A., Ray, E. B., Rudd, J., Botta, R., Ray, G. & Kopfman, J. E. (2008). “I’m all for equal rights, but don’t call me a feminist”: Identity dilemmas in young adults’ discursive representations of being a feminist. Women’s Studies in Communication, 31 (1), 104 – 132. doi: 10.1080/07491409.2008.10162524
Owen, W. F. (1984). Interpretive themes in relational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 274-287.
Sacks, H. (1972). On the analyzability of stories by children. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 325–345). New York: Rinehart & Winston.
Sayed, N. (2011). Towards the Egyptian revolution: Activists’ perceptions of social media for mobilization. Journal of Arab & Muslim Media Research, 4(2+3), 273-298. doi: 10.1386/jammr.4.2-3.273_1
Silverman, D. (1998). Harvey Sacks: Social science and conversation analysis. Oxford, England: Policy Press.
Sommerfeldt, E. (2011). Activist e-mail action alerts and identification: Rhetorical relationship building strategies in collective action. Public Relations Review, 37, 87-89. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.03.003
Swank, E. & Fahs, B. (2008). Students for peace: Contextual and framing motivations of antiwar activism. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 38(2), 111-136.
Valenzuela, S., Kim, Y., & Zuniga, H. G. (2012). Social networks that matter: Exploring the role of political discussion for online political participation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(2), 163-184.
Valenzuela, S. (2013). Unpacking the use of social media for protest behavior: The roles of information, opinion expression, and activism. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7), 920-942. doi: http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.net.ucf.edu/10.1177/0002764213479375
Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-43. doi: 10.1177/009365096023001001
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking. Organization Science, 409-421. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0133
Willermet, C., Mueller, A., Juris, S. J., Drake, E., Upadhaya, S., & Chhetri, P. (2013). Water as life, death, and power: Building an integrated interdisciplinary course combining perspectives from anthropology, biology, and chemistry. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13(5), 106-124.
Xu, Q., Schmierbach, M., Bellur, S., Ash, E., Oeldorf-Hirsch, A., & Kegerise, A. (2012). The effects of “friend” characteristics on evaluations of an activist group in a social networking context. Mass Communication & Society, 15(3), 432-453. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2011.583862
Zhang, W., Johnson, T., Seltzer, T., & Bichard, S. (2010). The revolution will be networked. Social Science Computer Review, 28(1), 75-92.