Universal Design for Learning (UDL): A Content Analysis of Peer Reviewed Journals from 2012 to 2015

Article Sidebar

cover image
PDF
Published: Jun 17, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v16i3.19295
Keywords:
Universal Design for Learning (UDL), Content Review, Accessibility, Individual Differences

Main Article Content

Ahmed Al-Azawei
Computer Science University of Reading
Fabio Serenelli
Computer Science University of Reading
Karsten Lundqvist
Computer Science University of Reading

Abstract

Abstract: The Universal Design for Learning (UDL) approach is increasingly drawing attention from researchers and educators as a possible solution to promote content accessibility and fill the gap between learner abilities and individual differences. This study aims to analyse the content of a set of peer-reviewed papers published from 2012 to 2015, where UDL framework was applied. We selected 12 studies from different databases and journals depending on 4 criteria: peer-reviewed journals, papers with empirical results, papers that focused on UDL as a framework, and the publication date. These studies were, therefore, categorised into seven themes: type of results, study beneficiary (learners, teachers, both), sample features, geographical region, data collection techniques, data analysis techniques, and learning mode. Most of the selected studies tested the framework in a traditional or a blended learning mode, whereas only one study evaluated its effectiveness in a pure online learning. Positive results were yielded in 9 out of 12 papers, but the majority of them were implemented in the USA. Thus, more research is required in diverse cultural contexts and learning modes to confirm the soundness of this instructional model on learning outcomes and learner experience. Additionally, UDL application in online learning may represent a promising solution to design a flexible learning environment from the start which responds to a wide mix of learner needs, abilities, background knowledge, educational experiences, and cultural differences.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Al-Azawei, A., Serenelli, F., & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Universal Design for Learning (UDL): A Content Analysis of Peer Reviewed Journals from 2012 to 2015. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(3), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v16i3.19295
Issue
Vol. 16 No. 3 (2016): Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Section
Articles
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
     
  2. Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.

  3. In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.

References

Akbulut, Y., & Cardak, C. S. (2012). Adaptive educational hypermedia accommodating learning styles: A content analysis of publications from 2000 to 2011. Computers & Education, 58(2), 835– 842. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.008

Al-Azawei, A., & Badii, A. (2014). State of The Art of Learning Styles-Based Adaptive Educational Hypermedia Systems (LS-BAEHSs). International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 6(3), 1–19. doi:10.5121/ijcsit.2014.6301

Al-Azawei, A., Al-bermani, A., & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Evaluating the Effect of Arabic Engineering Students’ Learning Styles in Blended Programming Courses. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 15, 109–130.

Al-Azawei, A., & Lundqvist, K. (2015). Learner Differences in Perceived Satisfaction of an Online Learning: an Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model in an Arabic Sample. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 13(5), 408–426.

Burgstahler, S. (2011). Universal Design: Implications for Computing Education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 11(3), 1–17. doi:10.1145/2037276.2037283

CAST. (2011). Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Guidelines version 2.0. Wakefeild, MA: Author.

CAST. (2015). CAST. Retrieved from http://www.cast.org/our-work/aboutudl.html#.VW1yKyFViko.

Center for Universal Design. (2015). Retrieved from http://www.ncsu.edu/ncsu/design/cud/about_ud/about_ud.htm.

Chekfoung, T., Lily, S., & Kecheng, L. (2015). BIG DATA ARCHITECTURE FOR PERVASIVE HEALTHCARE : A LITERATURE REVIEW. Twenty-Third European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Münster, Germany, 2015, 1–19.

Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post16 learning: A systematic and critical review.

Courey, S. J., Tappe, P., Siker, J., & LePage, P. (2012). Improved Lesson Planning with Universal Design for Learning (UDL). Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children. doi:10.1177/0888406412446178

Coyne, P., Pisha, B., Dalton, B., Zeph, L. a., & Smith, N. C. (2012). Literacy by Design: A Universal Design for Learning Approach for Students with Significant Intellectual Disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 33(3), 162–172. doi:10.1177/0741932510381651

Davies, P. L., Schelly, C. L., & Spooner, C. L. (2012). Measuring the Effectiveness of Universal Design for Learning Intervention in Postsecondary Education. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 26(3), 195–220.

Felder, R. (1996). Matters of style. ASEE Prism, 6(4), 18–23.

Graf, S. (2007). Adaptivity in learning management systems focussing on learning styles. PhD Dissertation, (December 2007).

Hall, T. E., Cohen, N., Vue, G., & Ganley, P. (2015). Addressing Learning Disabilities with UDL and Technology: Strategic Reader. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38(2), 72–83. doi:10.1177/0731948714544375

He, Y. (2014). Universal Design for Learning in an Online Teacher Education Course : Enhancing Learners’ Confidence to Teach Online. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 283–298.

John Clarkson, P., & Coleman, R. (2015). History of Inclusive Design in the UK. Applied Ergonomics, 46, 235–247. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2013.03.002

Kennedy, M. J., Thomas, C. N., Meyer, J. P., Alves, K. D., & Lloyd, J. W. (2014). Using EvidenceBased Multimedia to Improve Vocabulary Performance of Adolescents with LD: A UDL Approach. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37(2), 71–86. doi:10.1177/0731948713507262

King-Sears, M. E., Johnson, T. M., Berkeley, S., Weiss, M. P., Peters-Burton, E. E., Evmenova, a. S., & Hursh, J. C. (2015). An Exploratory Study of Universal Design for Teaching Chemistry to Students with and Without Disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38(2), 84–96. doi:10.1177/0731948714564575

Kumar, K. L., & Wideman, M. (2014). Accessible by Design: Applying UDL Principles in a First Year Undergraduate Course. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 44(1), 125–147.

Liakou, M., & Manousou, E. (2015). Distance education for people with visual impairments. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 18(1), 73–85.

Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs : A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 203–227.

Mangiatordi, A., & Serenelli, F. (2013). Universal design for learning: A meta-analytic review of 80 abstracts from peer reviewed journals. Research on Education and Media, 5(1), 109–118.

Mavrou, K., & Symeonidou, S. (2014). Employing the principles of universal design for learning to deconstruct the Greek-Cypriot new national curriculum. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18(9), 918–933. doi:10.1080/13603116.2013.859308

Mayer, R. E. (2011). Does styles research have useful implications for educational practice? Learning and Individual Differences, 21(3), 319–320. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.016

McGhie-Richmond, D., & Sung, A. N. (2012). Applying Universal Design for Learning to Instructional Lesson Planning. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 9(1), 43–59.

Özyurt, Ö., & Özyurt, H. (2015). Learning style based individualized adaptive e-learning environments: Content analysis of the articles published from 2005 to 2014. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 349–358. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.020

Pashler, H., Mcdaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2009). Learning Styles Concepts and Evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105–119.

Rao, K., Ok, M. W., & Bryant, B. R. (2014). A Review of Research on Universal Design Educational Models. Remedial and Special Education, 35(3), 153–166. doi:10.1177/0741932513518980

Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching Every Student in the Digital Age: Universal Design for Learning. (V. A. Alexandria, Ed.).

Rose, D., Harbour, W., Johnston, C. S., Daley, S., & Abarbanell, L. (2006). Universal Design for Learning in Postsecondary Education. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability (Vol. 19).

Smith, F. G. (2012). Analyzing a College Course That Adheres to the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Framework. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(3), 31–61.

Smith, S. J., & Harvey, E. E. (2014). K-12 online lesson alignment to the principles of Universal Design for Learning: the Khan Academy. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and ELearning, 29(3), 222–242. doi:10.1080/02680513.2014.992402

Truong, H. M. (2015). Integrating learning styles and adaptive e-learning system: Current developments, problems and opportunities. Computers in Human Behavior. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.014

Vanderheyden, K., & De Baets, S. (2015). Does cognitive style diversity affect performance in dyadic student teams? Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 143–150. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.01.006

Willingham, D. T., Hughes, E. M., & Dobolyi, D. G. (2015). The Scientific Status of Learning Styles Theories. Teaching of Psychology, 42(3), 266–271. doi:10.1177/0098628315589505