Using Indirect vs. Direct Measures in the Summative Assessment of Student Learning in Higher Education
Main Article Content
Abstract
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
References
Banta, T. W. (2004). Developing assessment methods at classroom, unit, and university-wide levels. Paper prepared for the Scottish Higher Education Agency. Retrieved October 30, 2012 from: http://www.bmcc.cuny.edu/iresearch/upload/Banta.pdf
Bell, P., and Volckmann, D. (2011). Knowledge surveys in general chemistry: Confidence, overconfidence, and performance. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(11), 1469-1476.
Bowers, N., Brandon, M., and Hill, C. (2005). The use of a knowledge survey as an indicator of student learning in an introductory biology course. CBE Life Sciences Education, 4(4), 311-322. doi:10.1187/cbe.04-11-0056.
Clauss, J., and Geedey, K. (2010). Knowledge surveys: Students’ ability to self-assess. The Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 14-24.
Cross, K. P., and Angelo, T. A., (1988). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for faculty. Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, University of Michigan.
Eder, D. (2010, October). “Closing the loop: No money, no time, and I’m expected to assess, too?” Presented at the Assessment Institute, Indianapolis IN.
Fort, A. O. (2011). Learning about learning. Liberal Education, (Winter) 56-60.
Hacker, D.J., Bol, L., Horgan, D. D., and Rakow, A. R. (2000). Test prediction and performance in a classroom context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 160-170.
Huffman, L., Adamapoulos, A., Merdock, G., Cole, A. and McDermid, R. (2011). Strategies to motivate students for program assessment. Educational Assessment, 16, 90-103.
Kruger, J. and Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121-1134.
Kuh, G. D., Jankowski, N., Ikenberry, S. O., and Kinzie, J. (2014). Knowing what students know and can do: The current state of student learning outcomes assessment in US colleges and universities. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois and Indiana University, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment (NILOA).
Liu, O. L., Bridgeman, B. and Adler, R. M. (2012). Measuring learning outcomes in higher education: Motivation matters. Educational Researcher, 41(9), 352-362.
Mabe, P. A. and West, S. G. (1982). Validity of self-evaluation of ability: A review and metaanalysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(3), 280-296. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.67.3.280
Martell, K. (2007). Assessing student learning: Are business schools making the grade? Journal of Education for Business, 82(4),189-195.
Nuhfer, E., and Knipp, D. (2003) The knowledge survey: A tool for all reasons. Retrieved October 31, 2015 from: http://pachyderm.cdl.edu/elixr-stories/resource-documents/knowledgesurvey/KS_a_too_for_all_reasons.pdf
Office of the Provost (2015). Outcomes Assessment. University of Wisconsin-Madison. Retrieved October 31, 2015 from: http://www.provost.wisc.edu/assessment/manual/manual2.html#a3
Pedersen, D. E., and White, F. (2011). Using a value-added approach to assess the sociology major. Teaching Sociology, 39(2), 138-149.
Price, B. A., and Randall, C. H. (2008). Assessing learning outcomes in quantitative courses: Using embedded questions for direct assessment. Journal of Education for Business, 83(5), 288-294.
Rampel, C. (2011, July 14). A history of college grade inflation. The New York Times. Retrieved October 31, 2015 from: http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/07/14/the-history-of-collegegrade-inflation/
The College of New Jersey. (2015). Psychology Major & Specializations. Retrieved October 31, 2015 from: http://psychology.pages.tcnj.edu/academic-programs/psychology-major-specializations/
Wirth, K.R., and Perkins, D. (2005). Knowledge surveys: An indispensable course design and assessment tool. Innovations in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Retrieved from www.macalester.edu/geology/wirth/WirthPerkinsKS.pdf