Who says: “No Fair!”? What Personality and an Experiment in Educational Value Tell Us about Perceptions of Costs and Benefits of Research Pool Requirements

Main Article Content

Lisa Cromer

Abstract

Human subject pools (HSPs) are the basis for much psychological research.  There is an explicit assumption that participants receive benefits from their participation, however there is little empirical research about the cost/benefit of participation.  We conducted two studies to evaluate factors that can affect the cost/benefit ratio.  Study 1 examined Big Five personality characteristics and number of psychology courses taken, in relation to perceived benefits.  There were depreciating returns for on-going participation but no personality differences in ratings.  Study 2 used a quasi-experimental design to manipulate educational value. Half of the participants completed an educational assignment that integrated their HSP research experience into course material. Students who completed the educational assignment had a strong sense of contributing to scientific knowledge whereas students who had no such assignment did not.  Implications for increasing educational value in HSPs are discussed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Cromer, L. (2013). Who says: “No Fair!”? What Personality and an Experiment in Educational Value Tell Us about Perceptions of Costs and Benefits of Research Pool Requirements. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13(3), 134–155. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/2037
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Lisa Cromer, University of Tulsa

Assistant professor of Psychology

References

Allport, G. W. (1961). Patterns and growth in personality. New York, NY: Hold, Rinehart & Winston.

American Psychological Association. (2002). American Psychological Association ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code2002.html

Aviv, A. L., Zelenski, J. M., Rallo, L., & Larsen, R. J. (2002). Whocomeswhen: Personality differences in early and later participation in a university subject pool. Personality & Individual Differences, 33, 487-496.

Brody, J. L., Gluck, J. P., & Aragon, A. S. (2000). Participants' understanding of the process of psychological research: Debriefing. Ethics & Behavior, 10(1), 13-25. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb1001_2.

Cooper, H., Baumgardner, A. H., & Strathman, A. (1991). Do students with different characteristics take part in psychology experiments at different times of the semester? Journal of Personality, 59, 109–127.

Costa, P.T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO personality inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Darling, J., Goedert, K., Ceynar, M., Shore, W., & Anderson, D. (2007). Learning about the means to the end: What US introductory psychology students report about experimental participation. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 6(2), 91-97. doi: 10.2304/plat.2007.6.2.91

Dollinger, S. J., & Leong, F. T. L. (1993). Volunteer bias and the five-factor model. Journal of Psychology, 127, 29-36.

Elicker, J. D., McConnell, N. L., & Hall, R. J. (2010). Research participation for course credit in introduction to psychology: Why don't people participate? Teaching of Psychology, 37(3), 183185. doi: 10.1080/00986283.2010.488521

Elliott, L. J., Rice, S., Trafimow, D., Madson, L., & Hipshur, M. F. (2010). Research participation versus classroom lecture: A comparison of student learning. Teaching of Psychology, 37(2), 129-131. doi: 10.1080/00986281003626862

Fischer, E. H., & Winer, D. (1969). Participation in psychological research: Relation to birth order and demographic factors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33(5), 610-613. doi: 10.1037/h0028112

Foot, H., & Sanford, A. (2004). The use and abuse of student participants. The Psychologist, 17(5), 256-259.

Friedman, H. S., & Booth-Kewley, S. (1988). Validity of the Type A construct: A reprise. Psychological Bulletin, 104(3), 381-384. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.104.3.381

Ganster, D. C., Schaubroeck, J., Sime, W. E., & Mayes, B. T. (1991). The nomological validity of the Type A personality among employed adults. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(1), 143168. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.76.1.143

Howard, G. S., Lau, M. Y., Maxwell, S. E., Venter, A., Lundy, R., & Sweeny, R. M. (2009). Do research literatures give correct answer? Review of General Psychology, 13, 116-121.

John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm Shift to the Integrative Big-Five Trait Taxonomy: History, Measurement, and Conceptual Issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114-158). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin, O. P. John, L. A. Pervin, O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed.) (pp. 102-138). New York, NY US: Guilford Press.

Kulich, R. J., Seldon, J. W., Richardson, K., & Servies, S. (1978). Frequency of employing undergraduate samples in psychological researchand subject reaction to forced participation. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwest Psychological Association, Chicago.

Landrum, R. E., & Chastain, G. D. (1999). Subject pool policies in undergraduate-only departments: Results from a nationwide survey. In G. D. Chastain & R. E. Landrum (Eds.), Protecting human subjects: Departmental subject pools and institutional review boards. (pp. 2542). Washington, DC US: American Psychological Association.

Leak, G. K. (1981). Student perception of coercion and value from participation in psychological research. Teaching of Psychology, 8(3), 147-149. doi: 10.1207/s15328023top0803_4

Martin, R. M., & Marcuse, F. L. (1958). Characteristics of volunteers and nonvolunteers in psychological experimentation. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 22(6), 475-479. doi: 10.1037/h0041496

Miller, A. (1981). A survey of introductory psychology subject pool practices among leading universities. Teaching of Psychology, 8(4), 211-213. doi: 10.1207/s15328023top0804_4

Miller, W. E., & Kreiner, D. S. (2008). Student perception of coercion to participate in psychological research. North American Journal of Psychology, 10(1), 53-64.

Miller, W. E., Kreiner, D. S., Ryan, J. J., & Smith, J. W. (2010). Personality types and perceived coercion in psychological research participation. Individual Differences Research, 8(3), 140-150.

Richardson, D. R., Pegalis, L., & Britton, B. (1992). A technique for enhancing the value of research participation. Contemporary Social Psychology, 16 (1/2), 11-13.

Roman, R. J., Moskowitz, G. B., Stein, M. I., & Eisenberg, R. F. (1995). Individual differences in experiment participation: Structure, autonomy, and the time of the semester. Journal of Personality, 63, 113–138.

Rosell, M. C., Beck, D. M., Luther, K. E., Goedert, K. M., Shore, W. J., & Anderson, D. D. (2005). The pedagogical value of experimental participation paired with course content. Teaching of Psychology, 32(2), 95-99. doi: 10.1207/s15328023top3202_3

Rosen, E. (1951). Differences between volunteers and non-volunteers for psychological studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35(3), 185-193. doi: 10.1037/h0061411

Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. (1975). The volunteer subject. New York: Wiley.

Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1976). The volunteer subject revisited. Australian Journal of Psychology, 28(2), 97-108. doi: 10.1080/00049537608255268

Scott-Jones, D. (2000). Recruitment of research participants. In B. D. Sales & S. Folkman (Eds.), Ethics in research with human participants. (pp. 27-34). Washington, DC US: American Psychological Association.

Sieber, J. E., & Saks, M. J. (1989). A census of subject pool characteristics and policies. American Psychologist, 44(7), 1053-1061. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.44.7.1053

Smith, D. ( 2003). Five principles for research ethics. Monitor on Psychology, 34. Retrieved from http://apa.org/monitor/jan03/principles.aspx

Thieman, T. J., Clary, E. G., Olson, A. M., Dauner, R. C., & Ring, E. E. (2009). Introducing students to psychological research: General psychology as a laboratory course. Teaching of Psychology, 36(3), 160-168. doi: 10.1080/00986280902959994

Trafimow, D., Madson, L., & Gwizdowski, l. (2006). Introductory Psychology Students' Perceptions of Alternatives to Research Participation. Teaching of Psychology, 33(4), 247-249. doi: 10.1207/s15328023top3304_7

U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare: The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979, April). The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the pro- tection of human subjects of research. Retrieved January 3, 2008, from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.htm

Witt, E. A., Donnellan, M. B., & Orlando, M. J. (2011). Timing and selection effects within a psychology subject pool: Personality and sex matter. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(3), 355-359. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.10.019