Let’s discuss: Teaching students about discussions
Main Article Content
Abstract
Research consistently demonstrates the benefits of employing classroom discussions; however, there has been less attention given to teaching students about discussions. The current research compared 2 advanced social psychology courses: 1 without (control) and 1 with (experimental) a week devoted to learning about and discussing discussions. Several different indicators showed marked improvements for the experimental group as compared to the control group. The differences between the two classes were particularly noticeable at the beginning of the semester. Even though the control group was able to eventually obtain similar scores, the differences at the beginning of the semester suggest that students in the experimental group benefitted early from the experimental condition. Additionally, measures provided directly by the students demonstrated higher ratings of self-assessment and course evaluations for students enrolled in the experimental class.
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
References
Aamodt, M. G. (1983). Academic ability and student preference for discussion group activities. Teaching of Psychology, 10, 117–119. doi: 10.1207/s15328023top1002_22
Bernstein, D., Burnett, A. N., Goodburn, A., & Savory, P. (2006). Making teaching and learning visible: Course portfolios and the peer review of teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Brookfield, S. D., & Preskill, S. (1999). Discussion as a way of teaching: Tools and techniques for democratic classrooms. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Cashin, W. E., & McKnight, P.C. (1986). Improving discussions. iDEA Paper No. 15, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development, Kansas State University.
Casteel, M. A., & Bridges, K. R. (2007). Goodbye lecture: A student-led seminar approach for teaching upper division courses. Teaching of Psychology, 34, 107–110. doi: 10.1080/00986280701293123
Frederick, P. (1981). The dreaded discussion: Ten ways to start. Improving College and University Teaching, 29, 109-114. doi: 10.1080/00193089.1981.10533690
Giordano, P. J., & Hammer, E. Y. (1999). In-class collaborative learning: Practical suggestions from the teaching trenches. Teaching of Psychology, 26, 42–44. doi: 10.1207/s15328023top2601_9
Meyers, S. A. (1997). Increasing student participation and productivity in small-group activities for psychology classes. Teaching of Psychology, 24, 105-115. doi: 10.1207/s15328023top2402_5
Nier, J. (2010). Taking sides: Clashing views in social psychology (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
Nunn, C. E. (1996). Discussion in the college classroom: Triangulating observational survey results. The Journal of Higher Education, 67, 243-266. doi: 10.2307/2943844
Phillips, H. J., & Powers, R. B. (1979). The college seminar: Participation under instructor-led and student-led discussion groups. Teaching of Psychology, 6, 67–70. doi: 10.1207/s15328023top0602_1
Voelkl, K. E. (1995). School warmth, student participation, and achievement. Journal of Experimental Education, 63, 127–138. doi: 10.1080/00220973.1995.9943817
White, G. D. (1978). Evaluation of small student-led discussion groups as an adjunct to a course in abnormal psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 5, 95–97. doi:10.1207/s15328023top0502_11
Yoder, J. D., & Hochevar, C. M. (2005). Encouraging active learning can improve students’ performance on examinations. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 91–95. doi: 10.1207/s15328023top3202_2