Examining the literacy histories of doctoral students in an educational studies program through surveys and interviews: A mixed methods study
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this mixed methods sequential explanatory study was to explain the relationship between literacy experiences over time and the literacy identities of the doctoral students in a teacher education and higher education program. The quantitative phase, surveying 36 participants, revealed a positive correlation between participant’s present and past literacy experiences, suggesting that past literacy experiences impacted their present perception of themselves as successful doctoral students. In the qualitative follow up multiple case study analysis, four major themes emerged from the interviews and participants’ visual representations: (1) past literacy experiences; (2) present literacy experiences; (3) support systems; and (4) social experiences. The findings suggest that early feelings of success in literacy contribute to strong literacy identities in higher education programs. Implications for the faculty of higher education will be discussed.
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
References
Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97-113. doi: 10.1177/1468794106058877
Bustle, L. (2004). The role of visual representation in the assessment of learning, Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 47(5), 416-423.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Drake, C., Spillane, J. P., & Hufferd-Ackles, K. (2001). Storied identities: Teacher learning and subject matter context. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(1), 1-23. doi: 10.1080/00220270119765
Faigley, L. (1981). Writing after college: A stratified survey of the writing of college-trained people. Technical Report Number 1. Prepared through the Writing Program Assessment Project, University of Texas at Austin. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED210708).
Gardner, S. K. (2009a). Student and faculty attributions of attrition in high and low-completing doctoral programs in the United States. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education And Educational Planning, 58(1), 97-112.
Gardner, S. K. (2009b). Conceptualizing success in doctoral education: Perspectives of faculty in seven disciplines. The Review of Higher Education, 32(3), 383-406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/rhe.0.0075
Gee, J. P. (2006). Self-fashioning and shape-shifting: Language, identity, and social class. In D.E. Alvermann, K.A. Hinchman, D.W. Moore, S. F. Phelps, & D.W. Raff (Eds.). Reconceptualizing the literacies in adolescents’ lives (pp. 165-185). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation design. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 255-274.
Guthrie, J. T., & Alvermann, D. E. (1999) Engaged reading. New York: Teachers College.
Hayik, R. (2012). Identity representations in visual text. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 35(3), 293-309. doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2012.717435
Hall, L. A., & Burns, L. D. (2009). Identity development and mentoring in doctoral education. Harvard Educational Review, 79(1), 49-70.
Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ivankova, N., & Stick, S. (2007). Students’ persistence in a distributed doctoral program in educational leadership in higher education: A mixed methods study. Research in Higher Education, 48(1), 93-135. doi: 10.1007/s11162-006-9025-4
Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), p. 3-20. doi: 10.1177/1525822X05282260
Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-133. doi: 10.1080/01443410701366001
Lavelle, E., & Bushrow, K. (2007). Writing approaches of graduate students. Educational Psychology, 27, 807-822.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511815355
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
McAdams, D. P. (1993). The stories we live by: Personal myths and the making of the self. New York, NY: Morrow.
McCarthey, S. J. (2001). Identity construction in elementary readers and writers, Reading Research Quarterly, 36(2), 122-151. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.36.2.2
McCarthey, S. J. (1998). Constructing multiple subjectivities in classroom literacy contexts. Research in the Teaching of English, 32, 126-160.
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis, 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Moje, E. B., & Luke, A. (2009). Literacy and identity: Examining the metaphors in history and contemporary research. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(4), 415-437. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.44.4.7
Mullen, C. A. (2001). The need for a curricular writing model for graduate students. Journal of Further & Higher Education, 25(1), 117-126. doi: 10.1080/03098770020030551
Mullen, C. A. (1999). “What I needed to know to get published”: Teaching (frightened) graduate students to write for publication. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 10, 27-52.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (1997). Writing a research proposal: The role of library anxiety, statistics anxiety, and composition anxiety. Library and Information Science Research, 19, 5-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0740-8188(97)90003-7
Schensul, S. L., Schensul , J. J. , & LeCompte, M. D. (1999). Semi structured interviewing. In S.L. Schensul , J.J. Schensul , & M.D. LeCompte, Essential ethnographic methods: Observations, interviews and questionnaires (pp. 149- 164). Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press, a subsidiary of Sage Publications.
Shaw, V. N. (1999). Reading, presentation, and writing skills in content courses. College Teaching, 47, 153-57. doi: 10.1080/87567559909595808
Shepard, R. (1993). Elementary media education: The perfect curriculum. English Quarterly, 25, 35-38.
Skerrett, A. (2012). “We hatched in this class:” Repositioning of identity in and beyond a reading classroom. The High School Journal, 95(3), 62-75. doi: 10.1353/hsj.2012.0008
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wadsworth, J., Halfman, A. H., & Upton, T. (2002). Strategies to improve the writing of graduate students. Rehabilitation Education, 16, 295-305.
Wao, H. O., Singh, O., Rich, V., Hohlfeld, T. N., Buckmaster, M., Passmore, D., Tonry, C., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Jiao, Q. G. (2009). The perceived barriers toward reading empirical articles among graduate students: A mixed methods investigation. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(3), p. 70 – 86.
Williams, B. T. (2003). Heroes, rebels, and victims; Student identities in literacy narrative. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 47(4), 342-345.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA. Sage Publications.