The Impact of Integrated Student Experiences on Learning
Main Article Content
Abstract
In a cluster of courses called Food for Thought, seven faculty from different departments (including Biology, Economics, Sociology, Chemistry, Health and Wellness, and Foreign Language) teach students about food information, food consumerism, nutrition and health. The classes all have a shared learning outcome focused on developing the student as an informed consumer of food. Each semester, faculty teach a food-related course from their respective disciplinary perspective while also incorporating cross-course interactions that allow for both integration of disciplinary knowledge and student-to-student learning opportunities. Previous research demonstrated that this approach leads to student perceptions of learning gains (Authors, 2011). Building on that work, this research directly assesses student learning in the Food for Thought cluster. The results demonstrate that exposure to multiple disciplines covering a shared topic enhances learning through greater student ability to integrate diverse forms of knowledge and to see an issue from multiple perspectives. These findings demonstrate the value of multidisciplinary learning opportunities for students.
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
References
Avens, C., & Zelley, R. (1992). QUANTA: An interdisciplinary learning community (four studies). Daytona Beach, FL: Daytona Beach Community College.
Cohen, N. (2010). Designing the sustainable foodshed: A cross-disciplinary undergraduate environmental studies course. Innovations in Higher Education, 35, 51-60. doi: 10.1007/s10755009-9126-z
Connors, P. (2008). Assessing written evidence of critical thinking using an analytic rubric. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 40, 193-194. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2008.01.014
Escribano, B., Agüera E, & Tovar, P. (2011). Designing an interactive activity to integrate animal physiology in the context of different disciplines. Advances in Physiology Education, 35, 464-465. doi: 10.1152/advan.00012.2011
Gray, P. J. (2000). Campus Profiles. Assessment and learning communities: Three examples. Assessment Update, 12(2), 10-11.
Inkelas, K. K., Vogt, K. E., Longerbeam, S. D., Owen, J., & Johnson, D. (2006). Measuring outcomes of living-learning programs: Examining college environments and student learning and developing. The Journal of General Education, 55(1), 40–76. doi: 10.1353/jge.2006.0017
Jaffee, D. (2007). Peer cohorts and the unanticipated consequences of freshman learning communities. College Teaching, 55, 65-71. doi: 10.3200/CTCH.55.2.65-71
MacGregor, J., Tinto, V., & Lindblad, J. H. (2000). Assessment of innovative efforts: Lessons from learning community movement. In L. Suskie (Ed.), Assessment to promote deep learning (pp. 41–48). Washington, D.C.: American Association of Higher Education.
Mahoney, S., & Schamber, J. (2011). Integrative and deep learning through a learning community: A process view of self. The Journal of General Education, 60(4), 234-247. doi: 10.1353/jge.2011.0021
Melendez, B., Bowman, S., Erickson, K., & Swim E. (2009). An integrative learning experience within a mathematics curriculum. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 28, 131-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrp016
Miller, D.R. (2004). An assessment of critical thinking: Can pharmacy students evaluate clinical studies like experts. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 68,1-6. doi: 10.5688/aj680105
Mulligan, G., Taylor, N., Glen, M., Tomlin, D., & Gaul, C. A. (2011). Cross-disciplinary thermoregulation and sweat analysis laboratory experiences for undergraduate Chemistry and Exercise Science Students. Advances in Physiology Education. 35, 206-212. doi: 10.1152/advan.00067.2010
Rhodes, T. L. (Ed.). (2010). Assessing outcomes and improving assessment: Tips and tools for using rubrics. Washington, D.C.: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
Romero, S. & Shahriari, S. (2011, March 20). Quinoa’s global success creates quandary at home. The New York Times, pp. A6.
Stefanou, C. R., & Salisbury-Glennon, J. D. (2001). Developing motivation and cognitive learning strategies through an undergraduate learning community. Learning Environments Research, 5(1), 77–97. doi: 10.1023/A:1015610606945
Tinto, V. (2000). What have we learned about the impact of learning communities on students? Assessment Update, 12(2), 1-3.
Wingert, J. R, Wasileski, S. A., Peterson, K., Mathews, L. G., Lanou, A. J., & Clarke, D. (2011).
Enhancing integrative experiences: Evidence of student perceptions of learning gains from crosscourse interactions. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(3), 34-57.